🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a increasing group of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a law lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised guardians to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid starting point," stated a leading MEP driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".

Earlier, interest built behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Charities have voiced concerns. An organization set up by the family of a young person who was lost after viewing disturbing online content suggests that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily happening at the state level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws requiring adult authorization for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various figures to mimic the Australian example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The agency points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

Even as this worldwide conversation unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers show that governments around the world are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.